Rumors of War III 04/30/2012
As an addenda of sorts to yesterday's blog post, "Welcome to the Theater of the Absurd," I am posting and highly recommending the following video. This is far too important to ignore. - TP2 Add Comment Welcome to the Theater of the Absurd 04/29/2012
Well, it has happened yet again. For the umpteenth time the Transportation Security Administration, the TSA, has managed to prove far beyond all reasonable doubt that they are as pointless as they are useless. Last Friday (April 27, 2012), the ironically named Newark Liberty International Airport was the scene of TSA inspired chaos when a terminal had to be evacuated, searched for bombs and terrorists, and all passengers had to be re-searched before being allowed to board their then late flights. The cause of all this mayhem was an unsearched baby. Yes, that’s right, an infant. A cherubic adorable potential terrorist in pampers whom the TSA failed to search. (Source) It’s incidents like these when I am tempted to use the popular WT*! acronym simply because it seems oh so appropriate and descriptive of my thoughts regarding the TSA. I mean, what in the world do they teach the TSA screeners in TSA Screener School? Do they not know how to find the terrorists the agency was created to find? Apparently not. Perhaps I can help. Okay, all TSA agents should pay close attention here. The individuals seen in the first image are terrorists. The individuals shown in the second image are NOT terrorists. It’s pretty simple really.
The TSA states on their blog that they do not profile passengers (Source), however, I would posit that the fact that they seem to focus their attention on those passengers who are clearly not terrorists, those passengers whose “profiles” are about as opposite from the “profile” of terrorists as can be, is in itself a form of passenger profiling. Sort of a “reverse profiling” if you will. In fact, the State Department recently issued an order banning the search of members of the Muslim Brotherhood, a group which has been linked to the muslim terrorist group Hamas (Source). This is, in my mind, further evidence of the “reverse profiling” that I mention. Has the TSA’s practice of “reverse profiling” managed to successfully stop terrorist attacks in the United States? No, actually, it has not. In fact, since 9/11 there have been 30 reported jihad attacks within the United States leaving over 100 dead and injured Americans. (Source) The GAO (Government Accountibility Office) has discovered that since 2004, twenty-three individuals that have been involved in terrorist plots have boarded airplanes and flown about the United States, and not once were they detected by the TSA. (Source) There have been at least 45 islamic terrorist attacks against Americans that have been prevented since 9/11. These attacks were prevented through a combined effort of intelligence agencies, local police and citizen involvement. The TSA was not involved in the prevention of any of the foiled terrorist attacks. (Source). In fact, there is not one documented case where the TSA have ever prevented even one terrorist attack anywhere! And, there are over 20 different islamic terrorist groups, including Hamas, Hezbollah, Al Qaeda, and Islamic Jihad known to be in 28 different cities within the United States.  DEYO NOTE: Terrorists are a very real and growing threat in America and to American interests around the world. It should be assumed these are not the only cell locations within the US and that they are subject to change. (http://www.unitedstatesaction.com/usa-terror-cells.htm) Surprisingly, the Obama administration has now declared the War of Terror to be over, and has taken the terms “war of terrorism,” jihadist,” and “global war” off the table of acceptable words within the White House. Somehow I think the islamic terrorists both within American and without either didn’t get this memo, or they are ignoring it. (Source). Meanwhile, back at the TSA, they have published their list of the “TSA Top 10 Good Catches of 2011,” and included on this list are such devastatingly dangerous items as snakes, turtles, birds, and a school science project. Falling just outside of their top ten list were invisible space aliens (at #13) and fish (at #11). (Source) And of course, let’s not forget about the cup cakes, breast milk, adult diapers, colostomy bags, and diabetic medication that the TSA has fearlessly confiscated all in the name of national security. Now, aren’t sleeping more soundly just knowing that selfless TSA agents are bravely stepping into the breach and laying their lives on the line just to keep you safe? Welcome my friends, to the TSA Theater of the Absurd. Breitbart is Here - Video 04/27/2012
We still miss you Andrew, but your spirit lives on within all of us. The Myth of Liberal Civility 04/22/2012
One of the greatest myths of history is that of the "Civil Liberal." For all of their rhetoric about tolerance and peace and love, liberals as a group seem to go out of their way to prove that they are none of these things. Case in point, The Lonely Conservative. No, she isn't a liberal. Far from it, in fact. Karen is a conservative who is passionate about her love for America and her desire to protect the country she loves. Because of that, she has become a target of liberal cyber-terrorists. Here's the article she wrote for her blog. And if you get a quick minute, you might pop on over there and give her a word of encouragement, and if you're so inclined and able to do so, give her tip jar a rattle as well. Hey, we're all in this together. More Civility from the Psychos on the Left April 21, 2012 By Lonely Conservative None of you have seen the vile comments left on this site day in and day out for weeks now. I send them to the dustbin of spam. But before doing so, I thought I’d start saving them for posterity, to remind me of the sort of disgusting, deranged, despicable and rotten people that walk among us. This is the civility of the left.  I had to edit a couple of "civil" words here. This is a family blog ya know. Don’t bother with the email addresses, they’re obviously fake. The IP address goes back to a service allowing people to hide their identities. How very brave of them. Hiding behind “Hide My A**.” Other times they use IP addresses of public places because they’re the worst kind of cowards. Some of the comments this troll (or these trolls) leave include email addresses of other conservative bloggers. They fill up my email spam. They sign petitions in my name. They email spam to others in my name. They send me emails that appear to be from my friends. They go to other websites and leave comments in my name – with my email address and links back to this blog – that are vile and wretched. Thankfully I have some friends who are kind enough to let me know when they see this happening. As much as I would like to leave comments on all of the blogs I visit, I rarely have time. If I did there would be nothing on this blog. I suspect that’s the reason they’re doing what they do – to distract me. To shut me up. They’ve even broken federal law by calling my home using phony caller ID services. The police officer I filed a report with was very kind and understanding. My phone company assured me that once the report is ready they will be happy to provide me with the telephone numbers where those calls really originated. We’ll have to wait and see where that leads us. This is the left. This is how they operate. Continue Reading Here: More Civility from The Psychos on the Left "Thanks to Republicans beginning to appreciate the heritage of our Grand Old Party, it has become better known that Republicans in Congress supported the 1964 Civil Rights Act much more than did the Democrats. Indeed, the legislator most responsible for breaking the Democrat filibuster was a Republican senator, Everett Dirksen. And now, the question that should be before us: How did that landmark legislation come to be? The answer to that is a source of pride for all Republicans today. The origin of the 1964 Civil Rights Act can be traced back to the Reconstruction era. That was when the Republican Party enacted the first civil rights act ever, the 1866 Civil Rights Act. Never heard of it? Democrat history professors would rather you didn't. With that law, Republicans took a big step toward making Abraham Lincoln's vision for “a new birth of freedom” a reality. Ominously, the assassination of the Great Emancipator had left the presidency to his Democrat vice president, Andrew Johnson. Senator Lyman Trumbull (R-IL), co-author of the 13th Amendment banning slavery, also wrote the 1866 Civil Rights Act. Republican support was nearly unanimous, while Democrats were unanimously opposed. This would be the first time Congress overrode a presidential veto of a significant bill. The law conferred U.S. citizenship on all African-Americans, according them “full and equal benefit of all laws and proceedings for the security of person and property as is enjoyed by white citizens.” Despite Democrat objections, Republicans made sure African-Americans had the right to own property, engage in business, sign contracts and file lawsuits. Andrew Johnson refused to enforce this law in the southern states, so it had little effect there. However, many racially discriminatory laws in the North were repealed or struck down as a result. Sixty-four of eighty Democrats in the House of Representatives had voted against the 13th Amendment. And so, Republicans feared that once the southern states were back in the Union, a Democrat majority along with a racist Democrat in the White House might undo all they had accomplished for African-Americans. What if they repealed the new Civil Rights Act? To keep that law safe from a future Democrat Congress, Republicans enshrined its precepts in Section 1 of the 14th Amendment. Another point of pride for the GOP is that Republicans voted unanimously for the 14th Amendment, while Democrats voted unanimously against it. Republicans followed this success with several more civil rights acts during the Ulysses Grant administration, including one that effectively outlawed the Ku Klux Klan. The next step was the brainchild of one of our party’s greatest heroes, Senator Charles Sumner. He wrote the 1875 Civil Rights Act, which anticipated the 1964 Civil Rights Act with its ban on racial discrimination in public accommodations. He had been pushing for the bill for years. On his deathbed, he told a former Attorney General: “You must take care of the civil rights bill – my bill, the civil rights bill – don’t let it fail.” " Read more at http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=50904 By Daniel Greenfield Monday, April 16, 2012 (Visit Daniel Greenield’s blog at http://sultanknish.blogspot.com/) With all the brouhaha, race-baiting, name calling, and the general sideshow atmosphere surrounding the Trayvon Martin / George Zimmerman case, many of us may have missed the real message that is being broadcast throughout it all. Lucky for us, Daniel Greenfield (Sultan Knish to those of us who follow him) has not forgotten, and is here to remind us that We Are All George Zimmerman. " Andy Warhol predicted that in the future everyone would be world-famous for 15 minutes. What he neglected to mention was that they were just as likely to be infamous. Zimmerman had decorated his flyers and website with the famous quotation attributed to Edmund Burke, “The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil, is that good men do nothing.” His activities reveal a man who took those words to heart, who put his time, money and safety on the line to become one of those good men who do something. But the problem was that Zimmerman had been reading Burke, when he should have been reading Kafka. “Someone must have slandered Josef K., for one morning, without having done anything wrong, he was arrested.” That is the famous opening sentence to Kafka’s novel, “The Trial”, words that have far more to do with the way we live now. George Zimmerman is not on trial because he shot a black teenager during a scuffle. It’s not the facts of the case that brought him here. It’s his name. Had his last name been Pereira, none of this would have gone anywhere. And it’s not the name alone, it’s that in this time and place, lynching him will help make the political fortunes of everyone from the man in the White House to his cheerful smiling prosecutor who is already counting her campaign cash and book deals. Zimmerman, with his book of quotations from the great thinkers of history, a man who clearly believes in the old fashioned virtues, is particularly ill-equipped to understand what is being done to him and why. The quotation that he plastered on flyers while investigating the beating of a homeless black man and on his own website, is more apt than he realizes. The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is indeed that good men do nothing, but as a corollary to it, those are exactly the sort of men that evil will go after. It does no good to read Burke quotations to a Kardashian society which makes its determinations, not on truth or justice, but on its omnipresent need for entertainment. Trying to reason with it only makes it angrier. Talking about virtues and decency to people who have none either confuses them or infuriates those few who understand the concept in some distant way. We aspire to behave the way that George Zimmerman did, to contribute to our communities, to defy the conventional wisdom and speak out when we see wrongdoing. We believe that all that is needed for the triumph of evil is for good people to do nothing. And we are only a misstep away from being George Zimmerman, from doing the wrong thing, from intervening in the wrong fight, drawing the wrong cartoon or saying the wrong thing at the wrong time, a heartbeat away from appearing at the bar of the kangaroo court of stage managed public opinion. In our own way we are all George Zimmerman. We think that society should be moral and rational, and that people should do the right thing. But that’s not what it is. It’s an insane braying donkey’s laugh as the thieves, large and small, rob the people blind and then muscle them into a lynch mob to go after some handy victim. It’s George today, it will be someone else tomorrow. Maybe someone who even deserves it. But it won’t be the people destroying the country, because they’re the ones leading the mob. George Zimmerman has been chosen to serve as a gladiator in the circus that distracts a bankrupt nation from the criminal folly of its leaders, large and small. He has been assigned white team colors, had an NRA badge pinned to his lapel, and is being shoved out into the stadium while the lunatic mob howls for blood. The Emperor of Hope and Change has already made the thumbs down gesture, the courtiers are rushing out to fix the match. Like Kafka’s protagonist, Zimmerman has been protesting all along that this is some sort of mistake. And he’s right. It is a mistake. Had the engineers behind the lynch mob gotten a good look at his photo, they might have pulled back and looked for a better victim. Someone who more properly fit their bi-coastal idea of a “cracker” to string up on the crooked scales of Lady Justice. But once a mob has gotten started, it’s hard to shut it down. And there’s no real need to stop. In the past, a media organ that reported a blatant lie might have at least paused on getting caught, but we live in a post-fact society now. The only thing that happens is that the media shrugs and doubles down on the narrative. George Zimmerman isn’t white? Just call him a white-hispanic. Insist that Latinos are really white even though your entire practice has been to loudly scream the opposite. Accuse anyone who points out that Zimmerman doesn’t look much like Larry the Cable Guy of being a racist. Problem solved. Zimmerman thinks it’s a mistake because he’s not guilty. But as Kafka might have told him, guilt or innocence has little to do with it. Zimmerman wasn’t indicted on charges of shooting a man, but of being a racist, of being the living embodiment of American inequality, NRA lawmaking and a dozen other sins. These are not charges that he can ever shake, because they are not legal crimes, they are political crimes." Continue reading at http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/46011 About the author: Daniel Greenfield is a New York City based writer and freelance commentator. “Daniel comments on political affairs with a special focus on the War on Terror and the rising threat to Western Civilization. He maintains a blog at http://sultanknish.blogspot.com/ [H/T to The Blogmocracy – Somehow I missed this. Thanks.] Okay kids, pop quiz time! 04/06/2012
 Can You Guess Who Said This? Read this and see if you can guess who said the following: “Success is the important thing. Propaganda is not a matter for average minds, but rather a matter for practitioners. It is not supposed to be lovely or theoretically correct. I do not care if I give wonderful, aesthetically elegant speeches, or speak so that women cry. The point of a political speech is to persuade people of what we think right. I speak differently in the caucus events than I do in Congress, and when I speak to Muslims, I say different things than I say to Christians. That is a matter of practice, not of theory. We do not want to be a movement of a few straw brains, but rather a movement that can conquer the broad masses. Propaganda should be popular, not intellectually pleasing. It is not the task of propaganda to discover intellectual truths.” No, it’s actually not who you think it was, but you’re probably not too far off. In truth the quote you have just read was said, but it was said in 1928. And it was said in Germany. I purposely changed just a few of the words, but the essence remains the same. The message remains the same. Here is the actual quote: “Success is the important thing. Propaganda is not a matter for average minds, but rather a matter for practitioners. It is not supposed to be lovely or theoretically correct. I do not care if I give wonderful, aesthetically elegant speeches, or speak so that women cry. The point of a political speech is to persuade people of what we think right. I speak differently in the provinces than I do in Berlin, and when I speak in Bayreuth, I say different things than I say in the Pharus Hall. That is a matter of practice, not of theory. We do not want to be a movement of a few straw brains, but rather a movement that can conquer the broad masses. Propaganda should be popular, not intellectually pleasing. It is not the task of propaganda to discover intellectual truths.” - Speech by Joseph Goebbels on 9 January 1928 to an audience of party members at the so-called "Hochschule für Politik", a series of training talks for Nazi party members in Berlin. Yep, it was Joseph Goebbels, the Nazi propaganda minister under Adolph Hitler. But it does sound familiar though, doesn’t it? In fact, it’s downright scary, and very, very revealing. Madea's Magic Race Card 04/06/2012
 After making an illegal left hand turn from a right hand lane, and thus endangering other drivers, film actor Tyler Perry was pulled over by Atlanta police officers. Perry, who is perhaps best known for his portrayals of the stereotypical angry black woman Madea, was uncooperative with police after being stopped, and did not roll down his dark tinted window when requested to do so by the officers. This act of defiance caused one of the officers to bang on Perry’s vehicle with his hand while again ordering Perry to roll down his window. Perry claims that the officers did not recognize him, and it wasn’t until a black police officer arrived on the scene that his celebrity status was recognized. Perry was not issued a ticket, in spite of his violation of the law, and his endangerment of other drivers. Perry later (on April 1, 2012) wrote on his Facebook page that one of the officers then ordered Perry to put his foot on the brake and turn off his car. Perry claims he was confused, and when he did not do what the officer had told him to do, the officer reached into Perry’s vehicle and attempted to turn the vehicle off. Perry stated that as the officer was attempting to turn the vehicle off, Perry reached down into his vehicles center console to retrieve his keys, but had forgotten that his keys had a black strap on them. The two officers who did not know what Perry was reaching for automatically tensed up, and at that point, Perry says he heard his mother’s voice speaking to him in his head saying, “if you get stopped by the police, especially if they are white policemen, you say ‘yes sir’ and ‘no sir’, and if they want to take you in, you go with them. Don’t resist, you hear me? Don’t make any quick moves, don’t run, you just go.” Perry says his mother grew up in Louisiana during a time when blacks were often lynched, and at this point, Perry says he realized that both officers were white, and that he no longer felt safe. I have to admit that when I first read about Perry’s encounter, I more than a little incredulous. Aside from the lame excuse for making an illegal left hand turn from a right hand lane (Perry claims he did this to see of someone was following him), why would he not roll down his tinted windows when he was first instructed to do so? Why would he not turn off his car when he was first instructed to do so? And why in the world would he reach for something in the center console, which would put any officer on edge? Why? Because he is a celebrity. Because he is famous and wealthy, and apparently thinks he is somehow above the law (shades of O.J.).  My internal B.S. detector really started pinging into the red when Perry began to follow a page right out of the Al Sharpton & Jesse Jackson Racial Playbook, and called on the memory of his mother who warned him that white police officers lynch black men, and then …. (dramatic pause) …. Perry finally noticed that the two officers were white (cue the ominous music). At this point in Perry’s Facebook post regarding the incident, he pulls out his race card and really ups the ante. He accused the officers of racially profiling him. The pulled him over because he was black, not because he broke the law and endangered other drivers. They “badgered” him because he was black, not because he was uncooperative and not complying with their orders, and not because he was reaching for an unknown object hidden from view in the center console. And he was saved only when a black officer finally arrived on the scene. Perry doesn’t quit there, however, and brings out the image of Trayvon Martin by referencing the incident in Sanford, Florida wherein Martin was shot after attacking a neighborhood watch volunteer, and another incident in Florida involving the disappearance of two men, one black and one Hispanic (this case is currently under investigation). Perry then calls for another black activist march in Florida, and for racial profiling cases (such as the one Perry claims he is a victim of) to be investigated by the FBI as hate crimes. The Atlanta Police Department is now investigating the traffic stop involving Tyler Perry, to determine if the officers involved, the white officers involved, are guilty of racial profiling. I guess that Race Card really works, at least when Madea flashes it. If a lesson is to be learned from this, perhaps it is that black people are above the law, at least when the law is enforced by white people. At least according to Tyler Perry. (Source) (Source) (Source) (Source) Cultural Marxism and the Death of Belief 04/05/2012
Reblogged from An Ex-Con's View By Paul H. Lemmen Considering the latest antics by Barry and his merry band of Marxists in attacking Christianity and using Hegel’s Dialectic to control the responses to media lies as well as foment race warfare, I think that republishing this under the original title is most apropos.  Totalitarianism relies on one main concept – the death of belief. Not simply the belief in God, but of all belief – in one’s nation, community, church, and even self. Totalitarianism can only exist when the majority of people have no belief in a nation’s moral standards, political reality and society; who, during that crisis in belief, reach out and embrace the resolution that the totalitarian regime offers as a life-line. This life-line is the totalitarian state itself – a Marxist Utopia, the State as God and giver of all to all. By offering the panacea of the all-knowing and providing State, the totalitarian regime seeks to supplant all the beliefs of the people with the State as God and its agenda. Cultural Marxism is the tool they are using. Now, I’m sure you’ll say that’s communism, or socialism, or fascism. Those are three roads that lead to the same end – totalitarianism – like in Nazi Germany, the former Soviet Union and Red China. All three ended up as totalitarian regimes under brutal leaders – Adolf Hitler, Josef Stalin and Mao Tse Tung. Why has America been immune? We haven’t. As our current political situation shows. It has just been much more difficult for the progressive/socialists to implement their agenda here because of the three founding documents created and built upon by the Founders and framers. America has been the nation with not only the most promised Liberties and Freedoms, but the most actual Liberties and Freedoms. The collapse and subversion of the American Republic has proven to be a tough nut, but not an insurmountable one. Enter the mechanics of division and failure called “agents of change.”  To understand how the progressive/socialist agenda got a foothold in our national political dialog, we must first look at the roots of Progressivism. According to Wikipedia: “Progressivism is a political attitude favoring or advocating changes or reform through governmental action. Progressivism is often viewed by some conservatives, constitutionalists, and libertarians to be in opposition to conservative or reactionary ideologies. The Progressive Movement began in the late 19th and early 20th centuries in cities with settlement workers and reformers who were interested in helping those facing harsh conditions at home and at work. The reformers spoke out about the need for laws regulating tenement housing and child labor. They also called for better working conditions for women. In the United States, the term progressivism emerged in reference to a more general response to the vast changes brought by industrialization: an alternative to both the traditional conservative response to social and economic issues and to the various more radical streams of socialism and anarchism which opposed them. Political parties, such as the Progressive Party, organized at the start of the 20th century, and progressivism made great strides under American presidents Theodore Roosevelt, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, and Lyndon Baines Johnson. Today, most progressive politicians in the United States associate with the Democratic Party or the Green Party of the United States. In the US Congress there exists the Congressional Progressive Caucus, which is often in opposition to the more conservative Democrats, who form the Blue Dogs caucus. Some of the more notable progressive members of Congress have included Ted Kennedy, Russ Feingold, Dennis Kucinich, Barney Frank, Alan Grayson, Bernie Sanders, Al Franken, John Conyers, John Lewis, and Paul Wellstone.[...]” So, here we see the wolf presented itself in sheep’s clothing – publicly benign: an attitude of aid and charity to the down-trodden. This is how the “One Worlders” achieved a toe-hold in America. They have exploited the toe-hold and incrementally inserted their agenda into our national political dialog. The tool with which such has been (and is being) accomplished is Cultural Marxism. Their aims have been four-fold:
It’s working here. Cultural Marxism affects every facet of American life today – from TV commercials to French Fries at McDonalds (via Michelle Obama’s “Lets Move” campaign and her revision of the FDA’s recommended meals and the food police that are in the public schools, remember the stories last week about children in NC having their home packed lunches confiscated?). The Cultural Marxists are leading us to a manufactured crisis – one of such scope and scale the majority of the people will lose all belief in our Republic and our founding principles. This is where the Marxist agenda steps in with a promising scenario that these uninformed, uneducated and manipulated masses will grasp out of desperation. Then will come the “fundamental change of America” Obama promised. Will it be a financial collapse? Probably. Consider this: His administration has nationalized major sectors of the economy (see bailouts)
Totalitarianism relies on one main concept – the death of belief. Not simply the belief in God, but of all belief – in one’s nation, community, church, and even self. Totalitarianism can only exist when the majority of people have no belief in a nation’s moral standards, political reality, and society – during that crisis in belief, reach out and embrace the resolution that the totalitarian regime offers as a life-line. This life-line is the totalitarian state itself, the new religion, the only thing you are allowed to have a belief in, the State as God, a Totalitarian Marxist Utopia. NB: The earliest version of this article exists at: http://therightplanet.blog.com/2011/09/18/cultural-marxism-and-the-death-of-belief/, written by Paul H. Lemmen under the pseudonym of poisontolibs. I own that site which has been restructured as a repository of my writings prior to October 2011. ©2012 Paul H. Lemmen, all rights reserved. For republication rights, please email: plemmen55@gmail.com [Just a quick note, if you haven't visited Paul Lemmen's blog, "An Ex-Con's View", I would highly recommend it. You can visit his blog by clicking here.] Why I Do Not Like the Obama's 04/05/2012
Reblogged from The Daily Rant By Mychal Massie Please visit Mychal Massie’s Website for more great articles and commentary. The other evening on my twitter, a person asked me why I didn’t like the Obama’s? Specifically I was asked: “I have to ask, why do you hate the Obama’s? It seems personal, not policy related. You even dissed their Christmas family pic.” The truth is I do not like the Obamas, what they represent, their ideology, and I certainly do not like his policies and legislation. I’ve made no secret of my contempt for the Obamas. As I responded to the person who asked me the aforementioned question, I don’t like them because they are committed to the fundamental change of my/our country into what can only be regarded as a Communist state. I don’t hate them per definition, but I condemn them because they are the worst kind of racialists, they are elitist Leninists with contempt for traditional America. They display disrespect for the sanctity of the office he holds, and for those who are willing to admit same, Michelle Obama’s raw contempt for white America is transpicuous. I don’t like them because they comport themselves as emperor and empress. I expect, no I demand respect, for the Office of President and a love of our country and her citizenry from the leader entrusted with the governance of same. President and Mrs. Reagan displayed an unparalleled love for the country and her people. The Reagans made Americans feel good about themselves and about what we could accomplish. Could you envision President Reagan instructing his Justice Department to act like jack-booted thugs? Continue reading here | Follow by RSS feed or by email or both!
Help keep the Realist up and running!
Hit the Tip Jar!
Click on Derpy the Derp bird to visit the Derp Wall of Shame!
Are You Safe?
Burn A Koran!
Just click on the burning koran to burn one yourself!
ArchivesApril 2012 TagsAll NOTICE:I have stopped blogging on the old IR blog, but will be keeping it up to serve as an archives of previous articles and blog entries. You can reach the old IR blog by clicking here. |
RSS Feed
